The War on Cash

 

The 2001 Nobel Prize-winning economist from Columbia University, Joseph Stiglitz, was quoted as saying: “I believe very strongly that countries like the United States could and should move to a digital currency.”

 

He argues that the move would give governments the ability to trace corruption, putting an end to illicit activities.

 

He also argues that cash facilitates crime because it is anonymous. And big bills are especially problematic because they are so easy to carry and conceal.

 

 

But that’s not all …

 

India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi has already removed 86% of his country’s currency from circulation in an attempt to curb tax evasion, tackle corruption and shut down the underground economy.

 

 

Sure, the bad guys would be inconvenienced for a while. But they would adapt, pushing their illegal activities deeper underground, out of sight, and further away from the watchful eye of the authorities.

 

 

Europe will most likely be next. The European Commission has already introduced a proposal enforcing restrictions on payments in cash.

 

And they’re pushing out all sorts of propaganda to do it, trying to get people to associate illegal activities with high denominations of cash.

 

The real reason behind this move to a cashless society is simple: Governments are going broke and these shenanigans are merely a hunt for more taxes.

 

Governments are simply looking for more power at the expense of their citizens’ privacy and freedom. And by eliminating physical money, Big Brother will have the ability to track everything we do, ALL the time.

To leave a comment, please sign in with
or or

Comments (3)

  1. willsblog

    “Digital currency”? What so the hackers have an easier time of it? What so it’s easier for the government to seize assets? What so theft can be legalized for the Liberals? This sounds like another half baked scheme from the Liberals to steal money!

    March 23, 2017
  2. stevehayes13

    In the Netherlands and Sweden people routinely use electronic payment for virtually all transactions. This has happened without it being imposed. It is simply a result of more and more people voluntarily adopting the technology (a process which means once a majority have adopted the technology, it is effectively imposed on the rest).

    March 27, 2017
    1. GovMisdirection

      You state choices that individuals can now make. I also use electronic payments for almost all transactions. This has little to do with the dangers of keeping large cash accounts within the instant reach of a government.

      March 27, 2017